Skip to main content

NIW Adjudication Standards: What Remains Unchanged?

A team of business executives standing together in unison

The basic eligibility standard for NIW cases is grounded in a three-prong test established by the Matter of Dhanasar (2016). This standard is unlikely to change, as it is based on established legal precedent rather than internal policy alone. The three-prong test evaluates:

  1. Substantial Merit and National Importance:
    The applicant’s proposed endeavor must have significant value and importance to the United States.
  2. Well-Positioned to Advance the Endeavor:
    The applicant must demonstrate that they possess the qualifications, expertise, and resources necessary to successfully advance their endeavor.
  3. Balancing Test:
    On balance, the United States must benefit from waiving the labor certification requirement, making it unnecessary for the applicant to secure a job offer before obtaining permanent residence.

Since this three-prong approach is rooted in case law, it cannot be unilaterally altered by USCIS and remains a consistent standard for adjudication.

Policy-Level Changes: What Could Shift?

While higher-level standards are unlikely to change, USCIS policy manual updates can influence how adjudicators interpret specific cases, particularly in fields like STEM and entrepreneurship. For instance:

  • Favorable 2022 Updates for STEM and Entrepreneurs:
    In 2022, USCIS introduced policy changes that provided clarity and favorable treatment for STEM-related and entrepreneurial NIW cases. These changes highlighted how contributions in these areas align with U.S. national interests.
  • Potential for Reversal:
    Internal policy changes are subject to the discretion of USCIS leadership. A new administration could reverse or modify these policies, potentially impacting specific categories of applicants.

Key Takeaways for NIW Applicants

  1. Core Standards Remain Stable:
    The three-prong test from Matter of Dhanasar provides a solid foundation for NIW adjudications and is unlikely to change significantly under any administration.
  2. Policy Adjustments Are Possible:
    Internal USCIS policy updates, such as those favoring STEM and entrepreneurial applicants, may shift depending on leadership priorities.
  3. Plan Accordingly:
    Applicants should focus on meeting the fundamental eligibility criteria and providing clear evidence of how their endeavors align with U.S. national interests. Consulting with an experienced immigration attorney can ensure a strong case regardless of policy changes.

Conclusion

While the Trump administration or other future administrations could introduce changes to USCIS policies affecting specific NIW cases, the fundamental standards for adjudication are unlikely to change. Applicants can confidently pursue NIW petitions by aligning their cases with the established three-prong test.

At Scott Legal, P.C., we specialize in NIW applications, including STEM and entrepreneurial cases. Contact us today to schedule a consultation or explore our free resources to strengthen your NIW petition.

FREE National Interest Waiver (NIW) Resources

Click on the buttons below in order to claim your free National Interest Waiver (NIW) Guide, sign up for our free National Interest Waiver (NIW) Webinar, or watch our National Interest Waiver (NIW) videos.

Download Our National Interest Waiver (NIW) Guide
Sign Up For Our National Interest Waiver (NIW) Webinar
Watch Our National Interest Waiver (NIW) Videos

Set up a National Interest Waiver (NIW) Consultation

For a dedicated one-on-one National Interest Waiver (NIW) consultation with one of our lawyers, click on the button below to schedule your consultation.

Schedule a consultation

This website and blog constitutes attorney advertising. Do not consider anything in this website or blog legal advice and nothing in this website constitutes an attorney-client relationship being formed. Set up a one-hour consultation with us before acting on anything you read here. Past results are no guarantee of future results and prior results do not imply or predict future results. Each case is different and must be judged on its own merits.

Leave a Reply

FREE WEBINARS