For certain foreign workers who have risen to the top of their professions or industries, an E-B1 visa may be a viable option for them. The EB-1 visa is a green card category for those gifted individuals who have demonstrated success at the top of their field. The EB-1 has three categories, EB-1(a) for individuals who possess “extraordinary ability” in their field, EB-1(b) for researchers and professionals whom have attained “outstanding achievements” in a particular academic field, and EB-1(c) for multinational managers and executives. This post will focus on the EB-1(a) category and defining the meaning of “extraordinary ability.”
Who Can Apply for an EB-1 Visa under the Extraordinary Ability Category?
The EB-1 (a) classification is for people who are recognized as being at the very top of their field and are coming to the US to continue work in that field. Unlike EB-1(b) and EB-1(c), no job offer or permanent job position is required for individuals of extraordinary ability, and an individual may apply on his own behalf. To establish eligibility, you must demonstrate national or international acclaim over a period of time and that your achievements should be recognized in the field of expertise by showing either that you: (1) that you have received a major internationally recognized award (eg. a Pulitzer prize, Nobel prize, Olympic Medal, or Academy Award); or (2) that you meet at least three of the ten requirements listed below. Most candidates apply under category two and when you petition is adjudicated, the government applies a two-step test. The first step is to see if you objectively meet at least three of the 10 criteria. The second step is a subjective assessment to see whether all of the categories viewed together rise to the level of extraordinary ability. The 10 categories to select from are listed below:
- Evidence that you received any lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence in the field of endeavor.
- Evidence that you a member of associations that require outstanding achievements of their members as judged by recognized national or international experts.
- Evidence that there is published material in professional or major trade publications or major media about you which relates to your work in the field.
- Evidence that you participated on a panel or individually as a judge of the work of others in the same or in an allied field of specialization.
- Evidence that you made original scientific, scholarly or business contributions that are of major significance.
- Evidence that you authored scholarly articles in professional journals or other major media.
- Evidence that your work been displayed at artistic exhibitions or showcases.
- Evidence that you played a leading or critical role for an organization with a distinguished reputation.
- Evidence that you or will you command a high salary or other remuneration for your services in comparison to others in your field.
- Evidence that you enjoyed commercial successes in the performing arts.
It It is important to keep in mind that the standard for proving extraordinary ability, as defined by the government, is quite high and denial rates range from 40-50%. The key theme of this requirement is your ability to prove sustained professional excellence such that you are in the small percentage of people who have risen to the top of your field.
FREE EB-1 / O-1 Visa Resources
Click on the buttons below in order to claim your free EB-1 / O-1 Visa Guide, sign up for our free EB-1 / O-1 Visa Webinar, or watch our EB-1 / O-1 Visa videos.
Set up an EB-1 / O-1 Visa Consultation
For a dedicated one-on-one EB-1 / O-1 Visa consultation with one of our lawyers, click on the button below to schedule your consultation.
This website and blog constitutes attorney advertising. Do not consider anything in this website or blog legal advice and nothing in this website constitutes an attorney-client relationship being formed. Set up a one-hour consultation with us before acting on anything you read here. Past results are no guarantee of future results and prior results do not imply or predict future results. Each case is different and must be judged on its own merits.